'The Reality of the Moon Landing\r'

'During the 1960s, the tatty War and the Vietnam War were in safe swing, and tensions grew internationally and nationally. People began to lose assumption in the moral and ethical appearance of the presidential term. One example of this distrust occurred hobby a major historical display case around the akin measure period. With millions of large number watching, a United States astronaut was televised ambit foot on the woolgather for the bewilder-off time.Some skeptics thought that the steergaze nonplus was sham by the U. S.’s desire to oppress the Soviet sum total in the length Race; how incessantly, the points make by these conclave theorists are mere speculation, lack potent demo and leave more than questions than consequences. For example, lying abtaboo the authenticity of the come came with besides very much of a unwrapk of generateting caught by new(prenominal) countries. Those who ingest the get neer happened in like hu world ra cener stated that the slug arrive was put down on a delineation set, just they do non consider that the modified make indispens adapted to create such(prenominal) a true-to-life(prenominal) scene were non yet create thoroughly large at that time.If the woolgather land was a falsehood, the double-dealing would be an immense cabalistic kept with enormous difficulty, considering the thousands of people who would be involved in the hoax. This paper will prove that the idlelight land did occur, and will also negate the opposing side. There was non enough pauperization for the U. S presidential term to coiffe the arrive on the bootleg because that rest would encompass as well as much of a risk and likelihood of getting caught by the gentle piece. Although President Kennedy was under a drove of pressure to compete and excel in the â€Å" pose Race” with the Soviet Union, that aspiration only served to motivate success.Ameri prat pride and co-oc currence for the U. S. space program was strong and would be even further bolstered if the U. S. would be competent to demolish the Soviets to the lunar month. According to the name â€Å"The finding to Go to the mope,” by Steve Graber, he states that â€Å"The purpose involved much consideration originally making it public, as well as enormous hu composition efforts and exp deceaseitures to make what became experience Apollo a pragmatism by 1969. ” intelligibly the decision to formally challenge NASA and the universe of discourse with this undertaking was non made lightly.Kennedy, at this point, was quite determined to prove that the U.S. did in concomitant possess the app fraudd recognition and the great power to lead the terra firma into space. President Kennedy, along with NASA, was determined to get a patch to the stargaze, and he brought the American people together and united them under the common final act of dischargeing their enemy by the destroy of the hug drug. Enormous efforts were under brass agency as NASA and the political sympathies began constructing their plans. The success in go underting a man on the lunation gave the U. S. dreaded advances in engineering, scientific knowledge, and improved sparing and political advantages from the use of satellites.Thus, by analyzing the motives to either bull through and through the arrive or to in truth get off the set down off, the obvious answer was that in that respect was little incentive to fake the get and tremendous benefits to genuinely landing a man on the moon. The U. S. government obtained enough motif to complete the goal of landing a man on the moon by the end of the decade because they would derive significant benefits and not because they urgently wanted to beat the Soviets; they also had no take to worry about the risk of getting caught since on that point was no need to to deceit, at that placefore, the U. S. did land on th e moon.Some conspiracy theorists retrieve that the moon landing was faked because motivation to â€Å"beat” the Soviets to the moon was excessively strong to ensure; however the government realized the other(a) motivations besides beating the Soviets, so the moon landing did occur. Both the U. S. and Russia were watching each other extremely closely, waiting for the other to slip. In his article â€Å"Did NASA Fake the Moon Landing,” Ray Villard states that a group of citizens made a convey that â€Å"The United States require to cement its world leadership during the parky War by pretending to pull off what really was a technologically im practical stunt.”But, the U. S. at this time did possess the correct technology and landing on the moon was not unrealizable because of the efforts put in by the technicians and scientists to create the essential machinery. The U. S. also wanted to make their world leadership stronger, but they could not lie to achieve that goal because the Soviets were watching the U. S. and their every(prenominal)(prenominal) move during this time. If the Soviets were to find out the landing was a lie or was represent then they would easily expose the U. S. to the world.But, the Soviets did not deny the landing and accepted the feature the U. S. landed on the moon commencement ceremony knowing we did actually possess the technology to go to space. This fact al hotshot provides evidence that the government did not stage the moon landing. horizontal though the U. S. government did desperately want to beat the Soviet Union in that respect was no reason to lie because the U. S. knew they possessed the power and the technology to nettle their goal. The government also knew that landing on the moon would bring more benefits to them, such as the advancement in science and a broader understanding of space, which would ultimately bring off them to not lie and follow through with their goal to get a man to t he moon.With the support and the money from congress and the title of the citizens, the U. S. acquired a strong determination to get to the moon rootage. Even though the theorists claim the motivation was wrong to land on the moon and that the government lied to the world, there is too much evidence in support of the moon landing because we did restrict on the advanced technology and the correct motivation; therefore the moon landing was not faked and did happen.The special set up at this time were not developed enough to stage a living moon landing and a film directed on land would not be adequate to(p) to fool the world, which means there would not be a reasonable way to fake the landing and the moon landing did occur. During the 1960’s the science fiction music genre was just emerging and the available special effects technology was not roughly as sophisticated as today. For example, if the moon landing was created using special effects the moon most likely would not look as real as involve and mevery people would start questioning the reality of the landing.In the article Villard goes on to state that at that time â€Å"No microcomputers, digital-image processing, or 3-D animation software package existed. The decades landmark space film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, illustrates the pinnacle of special-effects capability in the 1960s. ” Even the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey included flaws in regards to special effects because of how underdeveloped they were at the time the movie was made. The claim is that the same director who put down the movie was also asked to stage the moon landing.If such were the case, one would expect that the two films should contain similarities in production value, but the two sets of footage were both(prenominal) quite different from one another. superfluous proof that the landing was not filmed is provided in video of the astronauts walking on the moon: the moonwalk is far too thickening to be faked with the available special effects. In the videos, the men are almost undirected at points- a feat that would be im attainable to portray with the pull of soberness on Earth.1960’s America did not possess the movie making capabilities needed to create a believable moon landing on a movie set, leaving one other disaster: we actually did set foot on the moon. There are those that weigh the moon landing was filmed in a large Hollywood movie set, however, this cannot be true because the movie technology was not capable of such a trade union movement and there are clear prognosticate points for each reason the critics give voice the landing was filmed, such as why there are no stars; so there are strong facts that the landing did happen.The critics claim with confidence that the scientific technology was not there to send a man to the moon but they fail to tell a plowshare the fact that we actually did not hold the technology to produce a realistic film of the landing. The fact of the matter was that because of the advances of precede end scientists, engineers, test pilots, medical researchers, from cross shipway the artless and the test flights that orbited the Earth, we were able to get a man to walk on the moon for the first time.But, despite this knowledge, harmonise to an article from International Business multiplication the author states â€Å"Some theorists allege that NASA officials approached Kubrick former(prenominal) in early 1968 and asked him to film ‘footage’ word picture an earth ship landing on the moon and a space traveller walking on the lunar surface. ” small-arm the claim is a strong idea, the government would not lie about the landing because they knew the more benefits that would come their way if they were able to land on the moon.The knowledge of what the state would take in pushed them even further to stretchiness their goal, as they eventually did. Theorists also regularise that since there was no stars in the photographs brought back, that proves Kubrick filmed the landing because there are billions of stars in space, yet not one star was in the photographs. But the landing took office staff during the lunar morning with the sun sparkle too brightly. Similar to the fact that we cannot see the stars from earth during the day, they cannot be seen while in space either: they are too bright to be captured in a picture.So the fact that there were not any stars actually helps prove the moon landing was not filmed because that gives more reality to the pictures if thought about from a scientific perspective. Even though the critics accumulated possible theories as to why they believe the landing was filmed, each can be refuted with scientific explanations, such as why there were no stars or why the stagger was moving, and prove that Apollo 11 did land on the moon.If the moon landing neer happened and the world was lied to, such a brain-teaser would be almost impossible to sa ve for this long, and therefore gives proof that the moon landing occurred. Thousands of people would be needed to persist on the staging- everyone from makeup artists to the director, and to this day not a single person ever come forward claiming the landing was a hoax or even hinted at the possibility. There were also thousands who were a part of the actual moon landing. In an article from Balance-Today. org the author states, â€Å"Including the astronauts, scientists, engineers and technicians, more than 400,00 s eat uped workers contributed to the Apollo project. To date, not one of them even hinted that the landings were faked.”Again, there was no hinting or an accidental slip that we never actually succeeded in landing on the moon and all of these people who were a part of the â€Å"staged” event would gain a lot of fame if they came forward with their story. The Soviet Union would also never moderate the secret if they put in out. The Soviets were looking for ways to hurt the U. S. and they would not think doubly earlier exposing us to the world if they found out the U. S. government lied. Given humanity nature and the drive for power, fame, money and glory, it is precisely unreasonable to believe a secret this immense could be kept for this long.Considering the fact that nonentity came forward and confessed that the moon landing was a lie, then one can conclude the U. S. made the first man walk on the moon. Some avow that the reason nobody confessed the landing was faked, was because the government threatened and murdered people who would latently leak the secret; however the surmise of the killings cannot be true because there were too many people involved, and since nobody hinted that the landing was a lie the landing did actually occur.The theory of the government’s â€Å"murders” is implausible because of the fact that there were thousands who would know and would be involved in the process of not only th e actual moon landing, but a â€Å"staged” occurrence as well. In the article Villard states that conspiracy theorists believe that â€Å"The government scared and murdered potential tattletales, including its own astronaut heroes in a reprehensible assertion that the tragic 1967 Apollo 1 fire was rigged. ” However, despite the existence of unsafe and devious governments, the democracy of the United States would never allow the government to carry out such an atrocity.As was becoming more and more the norm, the citizens would ask questions, and the media, along with other countries would also become involved. Also, even though the theorists differentiate the government caused the Apollo 1 tragedy, that theory was be wrong. After a thorough investigating the tragedy was determined to be caused by a spark from a dead circuit in a tamp down of wires, quickly causing the fire to spreadhead through the flammable materials. The impossibility was too big for everyone t o believe the government could clam up or murder anyone involved.There were too many people and too many benefits for a person who could claim they worked on the great hoax ever. Even though the theorists tested to come up with an explanation for why nobody confessed, the idea that the government killed everyone is impossible because the murders would be too obvious, which means there was no secret that needed to be kept and no need to kill people who knew, so the moon landing was real. In conclusion, there is too much concrete evidence and reasoning for the moon landing to be faked. The U. S.retained the correct motivation to get to the moon first before the Soviet Union because of the benefits that would come to them such as what the satellites could offer and the scientific discoveries they found. pulling off the lie would help the country’s growing status in the world but they would not gain much more than that besides beingness able to say they finally beat the Sovie ts in the Space Race. The moon landing being filmed on a movie set is not possible either because of the lack of the special effects technology during this time.Nothing made on Earth would look real enough to be presented to the world, especially the realistic moonwalk since there is no way to float on Earth. strange what the theorists claim, we did possess the scientific technology to go to space and land on the moon because NASA and the government brought in the top end scientists and engineers to accomplish the task some say was impossible. The secret, if the moon landing was faked, became to enormous to sustentation and the government could not murder every person without the killings resembling genocide.Since nobody ever came forward with a confession there is nobody to prove the moon landing was staged. As a result, the theories that accumulated after the moon landing cannot be possible because of the scientific evidence and the fact that there were ten-fold moon landings c losely following the first Apollo mission which means we did possess the technology; therefore the U. S. government did not lie and the country did land the first man on the moon.\r\n'