Duccio Madonna and Child

This is the first time I do the museum paper, thats do me have a lot of mixing feeling, wondering, excited, curious Then, I went to the net profit to make some research in invention works at metropolitan Museum. Actually, Im interested in exposure for unmatchable rea tidings is I love drawing. I made roughly 11 oil motion-picture shows in my whole life. My life inspired me to put my sense into the painting, sometime it was sad, sometime it was exciting.The value of all the painting is non honorable solitary(prenominal) ab out(p) the drawing skill, but also the deep convey idea the artist want to put inside the painting and the personality the artist want to present in this painting. I tried to bet out what is the best painting to write about. One Europe painting was be amazed me is the Madonna and Child, by Duccio di Buoninsegna, acquired by the Metropolitan Museum of Art for $45 million, the most expensive purchase ever by the museum. I saw it online and I was so cur ious and wondering wherefore this painting cost so expensive.Then I decided to go to the museum to dramatise my receiptledge about this painting for real. In 1963, when the Mona Lisa came to the Met for a month, to a greater extent than a million people stood in long lines but when I went to touch sensation at the Duccio, I was the scarce person in the room. To be sure, 13 and 14 century Italian paintings lack the popular of works by Leonardo or van Gogh, but I think more(prenominal)(prenominal) people will be curious about something that cost so much more what the Met had spent on any previous acquisition. To turn around this painting for real was so amazingIts beautiful, the colourise were so unique, shinning and I keep wondering how it can be maintained cashbox nowadays. I came home and felt so hunger to research about this painting. That painting made me surprised every seconds. The Madonna and child by Duccio was purchased in 2004, made in tempura and gold on wood pai nting was made from 1295-1300. Remarkably, it has the original frame with a technique which would later buzz off popular in Renaissance paintings. The little picture which it just measures 11 inches high by just over eight inches wide has not attracted people that would make it difficult to see.But for real, the painting has a powerful earth with the meaning deep inside. The new holds the Christ child in her left-hand(a) arm and looks beyond him with sad tenderness, while Jesus touching His stimulates veil, and the Virgins distant expression. Why Mary was so sad? Perhaps, the sadness in knowing that her only beget son will someday die for the sins of mankind. The subdue about biblical was varicoloured by Duccio in a very unique manner for his time. The artist rejected the flat expression of earthly and heavenly beings that was the style of snarly art.We are at the beginning of what we think of as Western art elements of the Byzantine style still lingerin the gold background , the Virgins boneless and elongated fingers, and the childs unchildlike features but the likenesss of their clothing are so miraculously maintained, and the sense of human intercommunication is so convincing, that the two figures seem to exist in a real space, and in real time. However, The rigid line of Marys shoulder and her long nose out of Byzantine art. It testifies to a Jesus as a human child, able-bodied of fancy, rebellion, and love.It also testifies to a prematurely independent Jesus, able to sit up straight and to offer a regal blessing. Gold testifies further to the icons value, its function, and its subject matter. Imagine, in fact, the gold represent to a god. Right away, the work signals at its closeness to the viewer, but also its larger-than-life subject. In this way, it brings the divine into the lives of its beholders. Duccio di Buoninsegna was innate(p) in Siena, Tuscany in about 1256. He was one of the most powerful artists of his time along with that other great master from Tuscany, Cimabue.He spent nearly his entire working life in Siena. Despite not having a great deal of information about his personal life, we do know that he fathered at least seven children and that he died in 1318 or 1319. Duccio achieves the same end in a different way he creates not just an image, but also an object. Over time, images became more and more powerful. Artists used the illusion of real life to break through walls. The more real art became, the more it became larger than life. It took Modernisms rediscovery of the art object to furnish painting to earth. Duccio anticipated the puzzle of the imaginary.That aim helps account for his impulse toward the decorative. It drives the unexpected delicacy of his image. He has a softer, more personal range of color than one expects from a conservative icon, as in the robe on the infant Jesus. Duccios combination of the familiar, the divine, and the decorative extends to the image, too. When is the painting no t just only the painting but also the signature of something else. The Madonna and child was the stretch forth known Duccio still in private hands inspired me so much. But I keep asking myself why just only the lack of people know about the real value of this painting?